In this unit, I learned that linguistic identity is a group of people, just like collective identity, that have the same language. I found it really interesting that Metis people were both Aboriginal women and French traders. I can connect what I have learned in class to English and French because we are bilingual. What surprised me this unit was what the word marginalization means, which is the process of being left out of society. One concept that I am still having difficulty with is C.R.T.C. Do they just go on radios and televisions all around Canada? One question I still have is that if people have their own language, Why don't they want to adapt that language when it is dying? One learning strategy I found helpful was the Word Wheel. If I was to teach someone about this, I would tell them to compare the words anyway they want to. This will help them learn the words they need to remember.
Part B: Economic Globalization
In my own words, I think outsourcing means when a company hires another company to go to a country to teach them how to work. Transnational corporations do this because they want to reduce the cost. Another reason would be to improve business focus. And this is why transnational companies outsource.
Part C: Globalization and Identity
Par. 1: I think the Quebecers passed this law because they thought that they couldn't preserve the French language and now they think that they are confident enough to do it. An example would be what the speaker said, which is that the French language would move on forever and that they do not need Bill 101 anymore. This shows that Bill 101 is not desired. Therefore, because the speaker said that the French language will last for a long time and that they do not need Bill 101, This communicates that Bill 101 is not wanted in Quebec because the Quebec people know they cannot be Americanized.
Par. 2: Bill 101 had a lot of arguments against it. An example of one argument against Bill 101 was when the speaker said that they do not need Bill 101 to protect the French language. This shows that Bill 101 is not needed in Quebec because they know how to handle things on their own. Another example would be when the speaker said that "they know we can speak French and we will for a long time." This shows that Bill 101 is going to be in Quebec forever. Therefore, because of the speaker saying that they do not need Bill 101 to protect the French language and when he said that the French language will be in Quebec for a long time, this communicates that There were a lot of arguments against Bill 101.
Par. 3: Yes, I agree with the statement that Bill 101 is not needed in Quebec. An example would be what the speaker said in the source which is that they do not need Bill 101. I agree with them because I think that they can take responsibility of maintaining the French language. Another example would be would be when the speaker said that it is not the governments role to create an identity. This shows that they do not really want Bill 101. Therefore because the Quebecers want to take responsibility of the French language and do not want Bill 101, this shows that Bill 101 was not really required in Quebec at all.